Bilateral ODA is earmarked spend, i.e. During a consultation conducted in 2014, users told us that they use the statistics for a variety of purposes: preparing material for briefs; PQs and public correspondence; inclusion in reports and reviews and providing data for research and monitoring. DEFRAs ODA spend delivers against international climate, biodiversity and development objectives. Since 1970, the UN has set a target for donor countries to contribute 0.7% of their GNI to foreign aid. Budget Review 2020-21 Index. For the first time since 2014, there was no core contribution to the IMF-Poverty Reduction Growth Trust. This information is primarily inputted by spending teams in DFID country offices and central departments, with some quality assurance carried out at input and centrally to ensure that spend is in line with OECD definitions of ODA ii) Other Government Departments and contributors some of which have similar databases to record ODA transaction data. The list of countries is reviewed every three years by the OECD-DAC, and countries exceeding the high-income threshold for 3 consecutive years are no longer ODA eligible. Compared with 2015, the percentage share of DFIDs region-specific bilateral ODA received by Africa has slightly decreased (by 3.3 percentage points) and the share received by Asia has slightly increased (by 2.2 percentage points). In 2018, the country donated $14.2 billion. To help us improve GOV.UK, wed like to know more about your visit today. The countries that give the most foreign aid are among the wealthiest nations in the world. For more information please see the published note which outlines a new approach in more detail and provides an opportunity for users to give feedback. The OECD statistics provide ODA breakdowns for DAC donors (including multilaterals). The first table is based on official development assistance (ODA) figures published by the OECD for members of its Development Assistance Committee (DAC). The estimate in 2018 and 2019 is based on published data from the European Commission on the UKs share of development expenditure. Foreign aid is used to support US national security and commercial interests and can also be distributed for humanitarian reasons. Over 5 years: Africa has consistently received the largest amount of UK ODA. However, the nation has hit the 0.7 percent target each year since 2013. This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. The UK government made a commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on ODA from 2013. The UK is participating in the OECD DAC Peer Review process in 2019/20. For example, the International Development Association (IDA), which is part of the World Bank Group, has been one of the largest recipients of UK multilateral ODA since 2013 and the UK remains its biggest donor. DFID also contributed 1,050 million to Economic Infrastructure and Services, non-DFID spend is on a smaller scale and has a sector profile that reflects greater spend in broad sector areas such as research and policy, the largest sector spend being Multisector/ Cross Cutting (808m). Figure 16: Provisional ODA from DAC Donors, 2019. In 2019, 176 million was delivered through the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund. Canada - Unlike other countries, Canada has taken a unique feminist approach. support for international development work or asylum seekers/recognised refugees in the UK or another donor country), while 14.6% was for specific programmes or funds managed by international organisations in a specific sector with no designated benefitting countries. Over 5 years: Increasing from 2015, spend to Asia reached a peak in 2016 before steadily falling by 109 million to 2,235 million in 2018. The UK currently spends about 11.5bn each year on aid - after cutting the budget by 3bn last year. Dark blue = LDCs/Other LICs (Least Developed Countries/Other Low Income Countries), light blue = LMICs (Lower Middle Income Countries), grey = UMICs (Upper Middle Income Countries). The majority of non-DFID country-specific ODA was channelled to Middle Income Countries 71.5% (440m to LMICs and 412m to UMICs), LDCs and Other LICs received 339 million of non-DFID bilateral ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 112 million compared to 2018. This memorandum surveys U.S. economic sanctions and anti-money laundering ("AML") developments and trends in 2022 and provides an outlook for 2023. Figure 13 legend: DFIDs and Other Government Departments and Other Contributors of ODA (non-DFID) spend by sector, 2019 ( million). Correspondingly, 11 African countries featured in the UK's top 20 recipient countries. Britain will only spend . Note that provisional 2019 spend from other DAC donors is used in this chart. Information on the main definitions and sources used in this publication can be found in Annexes 2 and 3 respectively of the Statistics on International Development publication. The commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI on ODA has been met, UK ODA was 15,197 million, an increase of 645 million (4.4% increase) on 2018, bilateral through multilateral: this is earmarked ODA spent through multilateral organisations. The UK spend is highlighted in turquoise with the other donors in dark blue. The FY 2021 Congressional Budget Justification describes the funding required for State and USAID to carry out our missions worldwide. This could have an impact on the recent trends of some recipient countries. 2019 spend coloured in dark blue, 2018 spend in light blue. Figure 17 shows ODA spend as a proportion of gross national income (GNI) in 2019. We will be reaching out to users via the Statistics at FCDO page to help us plan future developments and meet users analytical needs as far as possible. The government's decision to cut aid spending [makes it] the only G7 country to do so. Within this sector, the majority of spend in 2019 was on Financial Policy and Administrative Management (746m). For further information on development issues and FCDO policies, please contact the Public Enquiry Point on 020 7008 5000. Former international development secretary Andrew Mitchell has tabled an amendment . The increase in capital will be used to make investments in Africa and South Asia, ODA spend by departments other than DFID (Other Government Departments - OGDs) and other contributors of UK ODA (referred to collectively in Table 2 as non-DFID spend) was 4,090 million in 2019, an increase of 434 million, or 11.9%, on 2018, ODA spend by Other Government Departments was the driver behind the increase in non-DFID ODA, with the top 7 highest spending departments all spending more when compared with 2018. The lighter blue represents the same measure but for ODA delivered through the Bilateral through Multilateral channel. This was an increase of 83 million compared to 2018, reflecting increased spending by FCO and DFID. , z is not applicable, 0 is null and ~ is less than half the smallest unit displayed. 2019: Bilateral ODA to Africa increased by 125 million from 2,863 million in 2018 to 2,989 million in 2019, increasing by 4.4% (Figure 4). According to the OECD analysis of donors provisional 2019 ODA spend, the increase is attributable to bilateral aid to low income countries rising[footnote 23]. In 2019, 97.1% of DFIDs region-specific bilateral ODA went to countries in Africa and Asia (4,224m). As the data in the publication is largely based on administrative data it is not subject to sampling error. Almost 25% of that budget has gone to just ten countries: Ethiopia ($1.13 billion) Jordan ($1.03 billion) Afghanistan . The Biden-Harris Administration's Request is a . Compared to 2018, Government and Civil Society had an increased spend of 118 million in 2019, with the majority of this coming from DFID (90m). The top 3 spending sectors in this area were Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management (217m), Civilian Peace-Building, Conflict Prevention and Resolution (199m) and Media and free flow of information (119m). This increased to 115.1 billion for final ODA for 2018 an increase of 0.3 per cent. Canada has been a global laggard in terms of aid generosity and . The UK works with a wide range of organisations, for example to: respond to humanitarian need; develop infrastructure; support economic growth; or ensure that particular diseases are tackled in line with the best available evidence. The Scottish Government, though its 10M pa International Development Fund, supports development work in its partner countries Malawi, Zambia, Rwanda and Pakistan, in pursuit of the Global Goals. Erratic budget processes threaten US foreign aid. Programmes involved providing humanitarian assistance such as immediate relief and emergency food, Nigeria saw the largest decrease in bilateral ODA compared to all other recipients, with spend decreasing from 297 million in 2018 to 258 million in 2019 (the next largest decrease was Pakistan by 26m). This is largely driven by contributions to a Reconstruction Trust fund, Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo, Dem. Other major changes in top 10 country-specific rankings, Figure 7: Rank of top 10 recipients of country-specific 2019 UK bilateral ODA. On 2 September 2020, DFID and FCO merged to form the new Department Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). ODA eligible countries are classified into 4 groups Least Developed (LDC), Other Low Income (Other LIC), Lower Middle Income (LMIC) and Upper Middle Income (UMIC) Countries. It is bordered by the Red Sea to the west; Jordan, Iraq, and Kuwait to the north; the . Despite the slight downward trend since 2015, spend is still higher than in 2012, spend to Afghanistan has fluctuated over the last 10 years. This approach is in line with how DFID dealt with the last major GNI methodology change[footnote 29] and provides consistency between the in-year monitoring and reporting of the ODA:GNI ratio. This report contains the release of finalised UK ODA spend figures for the calendar year 2019, including: Comparisons between 2018 and 2019 ODA figures are made, as well as trends over the last 5 years (2015 to 2019 inclusive as shown in most tables). , For further analysis on DAC country donors, see the OECD report on donors provisional figures. U.S. Foreign Assistance by Country. Multilateral organisations[footnote 18] are an essential part of the international system for humanitarian and development ODA. In the Blue Book 2019, the ONS implemented a major new methodology framework for GDP, which in turn had a sizable impact on GNI. Figure 12 provides an overview of bilateral ODA by major sector in 2019, compared against 2018 spend. in 2020, UK Official Development Assistance (ODA) spend was 14,479 million, a decrease of 698 million (4.6 % decrease) on 2019. , GNI is monitored using forecasts published by the independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to manage the 0.7% commitment, See background note (p. 43) in SID 2017, See OECD, Aid Statistics, Methodology webpage. , The Global Partnership for Education is an example of a sectoral-specific fund where amounts allocated to countries is not known in advance. These funds are overseen by the National Security Council (NSC[footnote 6]), that sets overall strategic direction. These are laid out in the DAC Statistical Reporting Directives[footnote 30]. This spend in the top 5 countries represents 28.3% of the total country-specific UK bilateral ODA in 2019, a slight reduction from 2018 when they comprised 31.2% of the total (Figure 6), in 2019 the top 3 recipients of UK bilateral country specific ODA were Pakistan (305m), Ethiopia (300m) and Afghanistan (292m) (Figure 6). Figure 5 legend: World Map coloured by amount of bilateral ODA spend in recipient country ( million) in 2019. You can change your cookie settings at any time. 3 minutes read. For more information please see the explanatory note that was published in September 2019. View full size version of infographic: In 2019 the UK provided 15.2bn of Official Development Assistance. Most policymakers understand that foreign assistance is a key instrument of U.S. foreign policy, but they also need to recognize that disruptions . The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said in a statement that Britain spent more than 11 billion in aid in 2021 and to date has invested 4.4 billion to fight H.I.V., tuberculosis . As a percent of . The proportion of bilateral through multilateral slightly increased compared to 2018 - accounting for 20.2% of UK ODA. The Cross-Government Prosperity Fund has increased its ODA spend year on year, since the fund started spending ODA in 2016, as they move more programmes into implementation, despite DFIDs ODA spend increasing, DFIDs share of total ODA dropped from 74.9% in 2018 to 73.1% in 2019. Further information on the technical terms, data sources, quality and processing of the statistics in this publication are found in Annexes 1-3 on the Statistics on International Development webpage. 4 minutes read. For media enquiries please contact the FCDO Press Office on +44 (0)20 7008 3100. The introduction of the grant-equivalent[footnote 24] measure in 2018 primarily affects countries with a high proportion of loans in their 2019 ODA portfolio. Designation means the statistics carry the National Statistics label and conform to the standards summarised below. Liz Truss under pressure to find savings across Whitehall as she tries to control spending and reduce debt after her tax-cutting mini-Budget. Highlighted countries are those in receipt of UK bilateral ODA, and colours are based on amount received (dark blue=higher amounts UK Bilateral ODA received, light blue=lower amounts UK Bilateral ODA received). The estimate for the UKs share of the EU ODA budget in 2019 is 983 million compared to 951 million in 2018. In 2015 the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act placed the 0.7% commitment in UK law from 2015 and in each subsequent calendar year. CSSFs main activities in 2019 were: tackling conflict and building stability overseas; improving capacity and accountability of security and justice actors; strengthening the rules-based international order and its institution, including women, peace and security; economic development; tackling serious and organised crime; preventing violent extremism. UK aid spending reduced by 3bn, or 21%, from 2020 to 2021. Charts and tables (data up to 2019) from the Report: Development Aid at a Glance 2021. While there has been an increase since 2018, the total bilateral ODA to Africa remains below this peak (7m less than levels in 2017). The UK commitment to spend 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) on ODA is reported the year following the spend based on confirmed ODA outturn and GNI estimates published by the Office for National Statistics. 3-min read. For enquiries (non-media) about the information contained in this publication, or for more detailed information, please contact: Alice Marshall